Delhi’s Saket court on Thursday concluded the hearing of arguments from social activist Medha Patkar and Delhi Lieutenant Governor Vinai Kumar Saxena, following Patkar’s conviction in a defamation case. The case, filed by Saxena, resulted in a guilty verdict for Patkar on May 24.
Metropolitan Magistrate Raghav Sharma, who convicted Patkar, requested a victim impact report (VIR) from the Delhi Legal Services Authority (DLSA). This report will help determine the extent of the loss suffered by Saxena and inform the sentencing decision.
During the proceedings, Saxena’s lawyer pushed for the maximum punishment, which could include a two-year jail term, a fine, or both. The lawyer argued that an example should be set due to Patkar’s repeated offenses, citing a similar incident from 2006 and accusing her of having a history of defying the law. “The circumstances against the activist are aggravating,” he asserted.
In defense, Patkar’s lawyer contested the claim of aggravating circumstances and denied that she is a repeat offender. The defense highlighted several mitigating factors, including Patkar’s age (70 years old) and her health issues. Additionally, the defense emphasized her significant contributions, noting that she has received 28 national awards and five international awards, including the prestigious Right Livelihood Award, which is often referred to as the alternative to the Nobel Prize.
The legal dispute between Patkar and Saxena dates back to 2000, when Patkar accused Saxena of publishing defamatory advertisements targeting her and the Narmada Bachao Andolan, a movement she leads.
The court’s decision on the sentencing is awaited, as the arguments presented reflect a stark contrast between the prosecution’s call for severe punishment and the defense’s plea for leniency based on Patkar’s contributions and personal circumstances.
